Home | About JCVJS | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |   Login 
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Search Articles   
Advanced search   

   Table of Contents  
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 3-8  

Goel's classification of atlantoaxial "facetal" dislocation

Department of Neurosurgery, K.E.M. Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication24-Jun-2014

Correspondence Address:
Atul Goel
Department of Neurosurgery, K.E.M. Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012, Maharashtra
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0974-8237.135206

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Goel A. Goel's classification of atlantoaxial "facetal" dislocation. J Craniovert Jun Spine 2014;5:3-8

How to cite this URL:
Goel A. Goel's classification of atlantoaxial "facetal" dislocation. J Craniovert Jun Spine [serial online] 2014 [cited 2023 Feb 4];5:3-8. Available from: https://www.jcvjs.com/text.asp?2014/5/1/3/135206

Atlantoaxial facet joints are the center of mobility and also center for instability of the atlantoaxial region. It is one of the most mobile joints of the body. It may not be an over-exaggeration to state that all craniovertebral instability can be incriminated to atlantoaxial dislocation. Occipitoaxial joint is the center for stability. Instability related to occipitoaxial joint is remarkably rare and identified infrequently in children with syndromic issues and rarely in cases with trauma. The atlantoaxial joints of two sides along with the occipitoaxial joints form the rostral two limbs of the "Y" shaped configuration of the human spinal support pillar. Any instability of the atlantoaxial region starts from the joint and manifests in the rest of the components of bones of the region. The concept of atlantoaxial instability based on facetal alignment or mal-alignment has not been discussed earlier in the literature. The atlantoaxial instability has been traditionally gauzed by the atlantodental interval that signifies the abnormal movement of the odontoid process away from the circle of  Atlas More Details and toward the neural structures in the spinal canal. The indentation of the odontoid process into the critical cervicomedullary neural structures result in related symptoms. Such instability is the more common form of atlantoaxial dislocation. The facetal instability can be observed on good quality and modern computer-based imaging. Such visualization was either not possible or was unclear with plain radiography that formed the core investigation not too long ago. To assess the instability of the atlantoaxial joint, it is necessary that the facetal alignment is appropriately evaluated, and the implications of mal-alignment of facets are understood. Three-dimensional computed tomography images provide a perspective of the relationship and alignment of the facets.

The facets of atlas and axis are strong in their material content and larger in size when compared to all the other facets of the spine. [1] Two large superior articular facets of axis flank the odontoid process. Superior facet of C2 vertebra differs from the facets of all other vertebrae in two important characters. First is that the superior facet of C2 is present in proximity to the body when compared to other facets, which are located in proximity to the lamina. The second is that the vertebral artery foramen is present partially or completely in the inferior aspect of the superior facet of C2, while in other cervical vertebrae, vertebral artery foramen is located entirely in relationship with the transverse process. Unlike superior facets of all other vertebrae, they do not form a pillar with the inferior facets, being considerably anterior to these. The course of the vertebral artery in relationship to the inferior aspect of the superior articular facet of the C2 makes its susceptible to injury during Magerl's transarticular and Goel's inter-facetal screw implantation techniques. [2],[3],[4],[5] The inferior facet of the atlas is almost circular in most of the vertebrae without any significant difference in the mean anteroposterior and transverse (15 mm) dimensions.

All types of dislocations can be divided into mobile and reducible varieties. The dislocation is mobile and reducible when dynamic images with head inflexion show the dislocation and head in extension shows complete reduction of the dislocation. Although such a dislocation can be observed relatively easily by the increase in the atlantodental interval on flexion of head, facetal mal-alignment can also provide additional information about the instability and sometimes can provide a clue as to the pathogenesis of instability. The dislocation can be completely reducible, or it can be partially or incompletely reducible. The classification of any dislocation into reducible and irreducible varieties has considerable therapeutic implications. Whilst fixation in reduced position is necessary in reducible atlantoaxial dislocation anterior or posterior decompressive surgery is possible in cases where the dislocation is fixed. Irreducible dislocations formed a distinct category until not long ago. The dislocation in basilar invagination was also considered to be irreducible. Goel introduced a concept that stated that atlantoaxial dislocation is never or only extremely rarely fixed or irreducible. [6] More importantly, the concept stated that the dislocation could be manually reducible. Even in basilar invagination the dislocation is mobile and manually reducible. This concept has revolutionized the treatment paradigm of a number of pathological entities involving the craniovertebral junction, particularly those where the atlantoaxial dislocation was considered to be irreducible or fixed. Decompressive bone surgery, both from anterior transoral route and also from posterior route are seldom considered in the present day treatment.

The head positioning and natural curvatures of the spine makes it susceptible for anterior dislocation of the facet of atlas over the facet of axis. Such anterior facetal dislocation [Figure 1]a] results in posterior movement of the odontoid process away from the anterior arch of atlas and into the spinal canal with eventual possibility of compromise of the critical neural structures at the craniovertebral junction [Figure 1]b]. We labeled such an anterior atlantoaxial facetal dislocation as Type 1 dislocation.
Figure 1:

Click here to view

We identified another type of atlantoaxial instability wherein the facets of atlas are dislocated posterior to the facet of axis on lateral profile [Figure 2]. This type of posterior atlantoaxial facetal dislocation has not been described earlier in the literature. The relationship of the facets on dynamic imaging is inconsistent in these cases. We labeled such instability as Type 2 dislocation [Figure 2]c-e]. We identified yet another type of dislocation wherein there was no facetal mal-alignment or any alterations in the atlantodental interval [Figure 3]a-e]. The instability or dislocation could only be identified by manual manipulations during surgery and can be understood on appropriate clinical evaluation. We labeled such instability as "central" atlantoaxial facetal dislocation. Essentially, it means that in these cases, the instability is present but dynamic images are unable to identify it.
Figure 2:

Click here to view
Figure 3:

Click here to view

In Type 2 and Type 3 dislocation, the atlantodental interval is frequently unaffected, and the odontoid process may or may not indent into the neural structures [Figure 2]b and [Figure 3]b]. As the neural compromise is not a prominent or an early feature, Type 2 and Type 3 dislocation are associated with chronic instability and the entire process is longstanding and relentlessly progressive. Although musculoskeletal alterations and neural structural malformations are frequently associated with Type 1 dislocation they are significantly remarkable and hallmarks of Type 2 and Type 3 facetal dislocation. Basilar invagination Group B is frequently associated with Type 2 and Type 3 atlantoaxial facetal dislocation. According to our current concept, all these structural musculoskeletal and neural malformations are natural processes meant to reduce the effect of instability and prevent neural compression and compromise. [7]

Our experience with direct facetal handling and manipulations suggests that the atlantoaxial dislocation is not fixed or irreducible in general and particularly in cases with basilar invagination as was previously considered, but instability of the region is "profound." We also observed that as soon as stabilization surgery is done, clinical neurological improvement occurs instantly and musculoskeletal and neural alterations reverse. It is as if the cord is stunned in this situation without being compressed. Signals of instability are passed on and reparative natural processes begin and proceed over long time durations. It does seem that instability of the atlantoaxial joint is the primary event and all the other musculoskeletal and neural alterations are secondary and basically protective. It may be that in some cases, the instability is initiated during fetal life, or early infancy and the reparative processes begin at that stage.

Lateral atlantoaxial facetal dislocation [Figure 4]a and b] is when the facet of the atlas is dislocated lateral in relationship with the facet of axis. [8] Such a dislocation is frequently identified when the ring of the atlas is bifid or fractured resulting in lateral migration of the facet of atlas in relationship with the facet of axis. Vertical atlantoaxial dislocation is when the odontoid process migrates superiorly on flexion the head and returns back entirely or incompletely to normal position on head extension [Figure 5]a-d]. Such a dislocation is related to incompetence of the facet joint. We labeled such a form of dislocation as "vertical mobile and reducible" atlantoaxial dislocation. [9] Rotatory atlantoaxial dislocation [Figure 6]a and b] is when the facet of the atlas is dislocated posterior in relationship with the facet of axis on one side and anterior in its relationship on the contralateral side. Such a dislocation results in torticollis. [10] Translatory atlantoaxial dislocation is a clinical situation when the facets of atlas of both sides are dislocated anterior to the facets of axis. [10]
Figure 4:

Click here to view
Figure 5:

Click here to view
Figure 6:

Click here to view

Surgery that involves direct facetal fixation like transarticular fixation or interfacetal fixation is mechanically and philosophically stronger than those that involve fixation of midline structures. [11] Such fixation procedures provide a "zero movement" situation that is conducive to early bone fusion and arthrodesis.

   References Top

1.Gupta S, Goel A. Quantitative anatomy of the lateral masses of the atlas and axis vertebrae. Neurol India 2000;48:120-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Cacciola F, Phalke U, Goel A. Vertebral artery in relationship to C1-C2 vertebrae: An anatomical study. Neurol India 2004;52:178-84.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
3.Goel A, Desai KI, Muzumdar DP. Atlantoaxial fixation using plate and screw method: A report of 160 treated patients. Neurosurgery 2002;51:1351-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.Goel A, Laheri V. Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994;129:47-53.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Jeanneret B, Magerl F. Primary posterior fusion C1/2 in odontoid fractures: Indications, technique, and results of transarticular screw fixation. J Spinal Disord 1992;5:464-75.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.Goel A. Treatment of basilar invagination by atlantoaxial joint distraction and direct lateral mass fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 2004;1:281-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.Goel A, Shah A. Reversal of longstanding musculoskeletal changes in basilar invagination after surgical decompression and stabilization. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;10:220-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
8.Goel A, Shah A. Lateral atlantoaxial facetal dislocation in craniovertebral region tuberculosis: Report of a case and analysis of an alternative treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:709-12.  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Goel A, Shah A, Rajan S. Vertical mobile and reducible atlantoaxial dislocation. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;11:9-14.  Back to cited text no. 9
10.Goel A, Shah A. Atlantoaxial facet locking: Treatment by facet manipulation and fixation. Experience in 14 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;14:3-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
11.Kuroki H, Rengachary SS, Goel VK, Holekamp SA, Pitkänen V, Ebraheim NA. Biomechanical comparison of two stabilization techniques of the atlantoaxial joints: Transarticular screw fixation versus screw and rod fixation. Neurosurgery 2005;56:151-9.  Back to cited text no. 11


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]

This article has been cited by
1 C1 laminoplasty and posterior atlantoaxial fusion for large retro-odontoid pseudotumor with Instability: A technical note
Masato Tanaka, Selim Ayhan, Taro Yamauchi, Shinya Arataki, Yoshihiro Fujiwara, Akihiro Kanemaru, Shin Masuda, Kenta Torigoe, Yasuyuki Shiozaki
Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery. 2022; 28: 101478
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Atlantoaxial Joint Distraction and Fusion with DTRAX Intra-Articular Cages: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study and Review of the Pertinent Literature
Alessandro Rapisarda, Giovanni Pennisi, Nicola Montano, Giuseppe Maria Della Pepa, Luca Ricciardi, Fabio De Giorgio, Massimiliano Visocchi, Alessandro Olivi, Filippo Maria Polli
World Neurosurgery. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Prediction of the functional and radiological outcome on the basis of independent factors with special emphasis on the use of 3D printed models in craniovertebral junction surgery
Rashim Kataria, Mudit Mehrotra, Devendra Kumar Purohit, Ajay Gupta, Monika Rathore
Surgical Neurology International. 2022; 13: 369
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Letter to the Editor. Adult cervical deformity
Atul Goel
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2022; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 External syringomyelia - is it an evidence of focal spinal instability?
Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2022; 13(3): 221
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Is evidence of bone “formation” and “fusion” in the spinal segment an evidence of segmental spinal instability?
Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2022; 13(4): 365
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Artificial atlantoaxial and subaxial facetal joint - Proposal of models
Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2022; 13(2): 107
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Posterior one is not the only approach: Ventral odontoid decompression in the spectrum of complex irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation with basilar invagination-When and why?
Jayesh Sardhara
Journal of Spinal Surgery. 2022; 9(1): 6
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Transoral odontoidectomy for pediatric craniovertebral junction anomaly: Is it redundant now?
Suyash Singh, ArunKumar Srivastava, Jayesh Sardhara, Sanjay Behari
Journal of Pediatric Neurosciences. 2021; 0(0): 0
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Spinal deformities - Is direct gcorrectionh surgery necessary?
Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2021; 12(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Report of two cases with omovertebral bone and Klippel–Feil syndrome with craniovertebral junction instability
Abhidha Shah, Akshay Hawaldar, Aditya Lunawat, Saswat Dandpat, Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2021; 12(1): 95
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Atlantoaxial instability in a case of Maroteaux–Lamy syndrome
Abhidha Shah, Neha Jadhav, Saswat Dandpat, Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2021; 12(1): 91
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Results of surgical treatment of patients with basilar invagination associated with type I Chiari malformation
D. S. Epifanov, V. B. Lebedev, A. A. Zuev
Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2021; 23(1): 83
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Fiberoptic bronchoscopy versus video laryngoscopy guided intubation in patients with craniovertebral junction instability: A cinefluroscopic comparison
Sanket Agrawal, Pravin Salunke, Shailesh Gupta, Amlan Swain, Kiran Jangra, Nidhi Panda, Seelora Sahu, Vivek Gupta, Summit Bloria, Ketan Karsandas Kataria, Hemant Bhagat
Surgical Neurology International. 2021; 12: 92
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Retro-Odontoid and Retro-C2 Body Pseudotumor, Pannus, and/or Cyst. A Study Based on Analysis of 63 Cases
Atul Goel, Hardik Darji, Abhidha Shah, Apurva Prasad, Akshay Hawaldar
World Neurosurgery. 2021; 151: e170
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Can Posterior Reduction Replace Odontoidectomy as Treatment for Patients With Congenital Posterior Atlantoaxial Dislocation and Basilar Invagination?
Huai-yu Tong, Guang-yu Qiao, Bo Zhao, Yi-heng Yin, Teng Li, Xin-guang Yu, Rui Zong
Operative Neurosurgery. 2020; 18(6): 660
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Chiari Malformation and Syringomyelia Associated with Hirayama Disease
Atul Goel, Neha Jadhav, Abhidha Shah, Survendra Rai, Ravikiran Vutha
World Neurosurgery. 2020; 135: 241
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 Letter to the Editor Regarding “Congenital Fusion of Dens to T3 Vertebra in Klippel-Feil Syndrome”
Atul Goel
World Neurosurgery. 2020; 144: 314
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 Central atlantoaxial instability as a cause of syringomyelia mimic intramedullary lipoma
Atul Goel, Abhinandan Patil, Abhidha Shah, Survendra Rai, Ravikiran Vutha, Shashi Ranjan
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2020; 11(2): 152
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 When is inclusion of C2 vertebra in the fixation construct necessary in cases with multi-level spinal degeneration?
Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2020; 11(4): 249
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
21 Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
Atul Goel, Dikpal Jadhav, Abhidha Shah, Survendra Rai, Saswat Dandpat, Neha Jadhav, Tejas Vaja
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2020; 11(1): 46
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
22 Indicators of spinal instability in degenerative spinal disease
Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2020; 11(3): 155
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
23 Commentary: Comprehensive Drilling of C1-2 Facets in Congenital Atlanto-Axial Dislocation and Basilar Invagination: Critical Review
Ahmed Al Jishi
Operative Neurosurgery. 2019; 16(2): E58
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
24 Tethered cord and Chiari formation: Analysis of treatment in a relatively rare clinical situation
Atul Goel, Shashi Ranjan, Abhidha Shah, Sagar Bhambere, Hardik Darji
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2019; 10(4): 247
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
25 Evaluating Atlantoaxial Dislocation Based on Cartesian Coordinates: Proposing a New Definition and Its Impact on Assessment of Congenital Torticollis
Jayesh Sardhara, Sanjay Behari, Pavaman Sindgikar, Arun Kumar Srivastava, Anant Mehrotra, Kuntal Kanti Das, Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora, Rabi N Sahu, Awadhesh K Jaiswal
Neurosurgery. 2018; 82(4): 525
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
26 Letter: Occipitocervical Fixation: A Single Surgeon's Experience with 120 Patients
Atul Goel
Neurosurgery. 2017; 80(6): E263
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
27 Letter
Huaiyu Tong, Xin-guang Yu, Shengli Guo
Neurosurgery. 2015; 76(2): E239
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
28 Letter to the Editor: Chiari malformation Type 1 and atlantoaxial instability: a letter from the Pediatric Craniocervical Society
Douglas L. Brockmeyer, W. Jerry Oakes, Curtis Rozzelle, James Johnston, Brandon G. Rocque, Richard C. E. Anderson, Neil Feldstein, Jonathan Martin, Gerald F. Tuite, Luis Rodriguez, Nicholas Wetjen, Phillip Aldana, Dave Pincus, Phillip Storm, Mark R. Proctor, Sean Lew
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2015; 23(6): 820
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
29 Malformations of the cranio-cervical junction: basilar impression
Gonzalo Bertullo, Viviana Cabrera
American Journal of BioMedicine. 2015; 3(9): 545
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded111    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 29    

Recommend this journal