Home | About JCVJS | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |   Login 
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Search Articles   
Advanced search   
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 169-172

Complication rates following Chiari malformation surgical management for Arnold–Chiari type I based on surgical variables: A national perspective

1 Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
3 Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Suny Downstate, New York, NY, USA

Correspondence Address:
Peter G Passias
Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, 301 East 17th Street, New York 10003, NY
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_69_20

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: This study aimed to identify complication trends of Chiari Malformation Type 1 patients (CM-1) for certain procedures and concomitant diagnoses on a national level. Materials and Methods: The Kids' Inpatient Database was queried for diagnoses of operative CM-1 by International Classification of Disease-9 codes (348.4). Differences in preoperative demographics and perioperative complication rates between patient cohorts were assessed using Pearson's Chi-squared test and t-test when necessary. Binary logistic regression was utilized to find significant factors associated with complication rate. Certain surgical procedures were analyzed for their relationship with postoperative outcomes. Results: Thirteen thousand eight hundred and twelve CM-1 patients were identified with 8.2% suffering from a complication. From 2003 to 2012, the rate of complications for CM-1 pts decreased significantly (9.6%–5.1%) along with surgical rate (33.3%–28.6%), despite the increase in CM-1 diagnosis (36.3%–42.3%; all P < 0.05). CM-1 pts who had a complication were younger and had a lower invasiveness score; however, they had a larger Charlson Comorbidity Index than those who did not have a complication (all P < 0.05). CM-1 pts who experienced complications had a concurrent diagnosis of syringomyelia (7.1%), and also scoliosis (3.2%; all P < 0.05). CM-1 pts who did not have a complication had a greater rate of operation than those that had a complication (76.4% vs. 23.6% P < 0.05). The most common complications were nervous system related (2.8%), anemia (2.4%), and acute respiratory distress (2.1%). CM-1 pts that underwent an instrumented fusion (3.4% vs. 2.1%) had a greater complication rate as well as compared to those who underwent a craniotomy (23.2% vs. 19.1%; all P < 0.05). However, CM-1 pts that underwent a decompression had lower postoperative complications (21.3% vs. 28.9%; all P < 0.05). Conclusions: Chiari patients undergoing craniectomies as well as instrumented fusions are at a higher risk of postoperative complications especially when the instrumented fusions were performed on >4 levels.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded119    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal