Home | About JCVJS | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |   Login 
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Search Articles   
Advanced search   
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 248-256

Surgical treatment outcome on a national cohort of 176 patients with cervical manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis

1 Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
2 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
3 Department of Anatomy, Laboratory for Applied and Clinical Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Semmelweis University Budapest, Hungary, Europe; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen am Neckar, Germany

Correspondence Address:
Anna MacDowall
Department of Surgical Sciences, Entrance 61, 6th Floor, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_200_20

Rights and Permissions

Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affecting the cervical spine results in instability and deformity that can be divided into the subtypes C1–C2 horizontal (atlantoaxial instability), C0–C2 vertical (basilar invagination), subaxial, and combined instabilities. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical treatments and outcomes of RA-related deformity and instability in a population-based setting. Patients and Methods: All patients with RA in the national Swespine register from January 1, 2006, to March 20, 2019, were assessed. Baseline characteristics, surgical treatments, European Myelopathy Scale (EMS), Neck Disability Index, the Visual Analog Scale for neck and arm pain as well as pre- and postoperative imaging were analyzed. The follow-up time points were at 1-, 2-, and 5 years after surgery. Results: A total of 176 patients were included. There were 62 (35%) patients with C1–C2 horizontal instability, 48 (27%) with C0–C2 vertical instability, 19 (11%) patients with subaxial instability, 43 (24%) patients with combined instability, and 4 patients without instability served as controls. The EMS improved in the C1–C2 horizontal instability group after fusion surgery (Δ =2.6 p) but remained within baseline confidence intervals in the other groups. All patients regardless of instability improved in pain. The subaxial instability had the highest risk of death within 5 years after surgery (11/19, 58%). The most dangerous complications due to implant failure were seen in patients instrumented with laminar hooks. Conclusion: The neurological outcome after fusion surgery is poor and the death rate is high in patients with cervical RA-related instability and deformity.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded189    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal