Home | About JCVJS | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |   Login 
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Search Articles   
    
Advanced search   
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 368-375

Integral fixation titanium/polyetheretherketone cages for cervical arthrodesis: Two-year clinical outcomes and fusion rates using β-tricalcium phosphate or supercritical carbon dioxide treated allograft


1 NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney; Neuro Spine Clinic, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick; Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney; Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Labs (SORL), Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
2 NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney; Neuro Spine Clinic, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick; Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Australia
3 Matrix Medical Innovations, Randwick, Sydney, Australia
4 NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG); Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Labs (SORL), Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Correspondence Address:
Tajrian Amin
Prince of Wales Private Hospital, 320-346 Barker St, Randwick NSW 2031
Australia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_129_21

Rights and Permissions

Context: Despite increasing promising reports regarding composite titanium (Ti)/PolyEtherEtherKetone (PEEK) cages, further longer-term, quality research is required. Synthetic bone graft substitutes are another rapidly developing area of spinal surgical research. Aims: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of an integral fixation composite Ti/PEEK cage for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and compare a synthetic bone graft substitute (β-tricalcium phosphate; [βTCP]) with allograft processed using supercritical fluid technology. Methods and Design: Data from 195 consecutive patients were prospectively collected from a single centre. Indications were largely degenerative. Allograft and βTCP were used in a 3:1 randomization protocol. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months and up to 48 months. Clinical outcomes included visual analogue scale and neck oswestry disability index. Radiographic outcomes included fusion rates, subsidence rates and implant complications. Results: Graft sub-cohorts were largely comparable and included 133 and 52 patients in the allograft and βTCP sub-cohorts, respectively. Clinical outcomes overall significantly improved (P < 0.001), with no significant inter-cohort differences. There were no implant-related complications. Overall fusion rate was 94.1% (175/186). The allograft cohort produced a significantly greater fusion rate of 97.7% (126/129) compared to 77.6% (38/49) for the βTCP cohort (P = 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the viability of an integral fixation composite Ti/PEEK ACDF device in effectively and safely improving patient outcomes and achieving fusion. Allograft is more effective in achieving fusion compared to βTCP, though both were similarly efficacious in improving clinical outcomes.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed348    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded35    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal