Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2022  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 48--54

Retrospective evaluation of cervical fusion with DTRAX (R) cervical cage


Hamed Yazdanshenas1, Ethan Osias2, Richard Hwang3, Don Y Park3, Elizabeth Lord3, Arya N Shamie3 
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery; Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA); Department of Orthopaedic Surgery; Department of General Surgery; Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA); Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA

Correspondence Address:
Arya N Shamie
Chief of Spine Surgery, Vice Chair of International Affairs, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA
USA

Background: Cervical radiculopathy is a relatively common problem that often affects individuals in their 5th decade. Most cases resolve with conservative treatment, but when unsuccessful, many opt for surgical intervention. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is currently considered the gold standard for the surgical management of cervical radiculopathy. One promising alternative, the DTRAX facet system is minimally invasive and may significantly reduce or eliminate cervical radicular symptoms. This case series and literature review looks to investigate the safety and efficacy of the DTRAX facet system in treating cervical radiculopathy. Methods: This retrospective analysis was performed by chart review of patients who underwent posterior cervical fusion and received the DTRAX spinal implant at University of California, Los Angeles within the last 8 years. Patient charts were located using the surgical cases report function of Epic electronic medical record, and patients were included in the study if they received a DTRAX implant during the stated time period. Data were compiled and analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Results: A total of 14 patient charts were reviewed. Of the 14, there were no immediate postoperative complications. One international patient was subsequently lost to follow-up, and of the remaining 13, mean follow-up duration was 273 days, with a range of 15–660 days. All but one reported improvement of symptoms postoperatively, there were no device failures, and no reoperations were required. There were similar outcomes in patients who received single versus multilevel operations. Conclusion: The findings of this retrospective study of 14 patients who received the DTRAX facet system over the last 8 years support the conclusions of previous studies that DTRAX is safe and effective. In addition, this is the first study to look for differences in outcomes between single and multi-level DTRAX operations, of which there were none. Further investigation with larger cohorts should be conducted as DTRAX becomes more widely adopted in order to verify its safety and efficacy in various clinical scenarios.


How to cite this article:
Yazdanshenas H, Osias E, Hwang R, Park DY, Lord E, Shamie AN. Retrospective evaluation of cervical fusion with DTRAX (R) cervical cage.J Craniovert Jun Spine 2022;13:48-54


How to cite this URL:
Yazdanshenas H, Osias E, Hwang R, Park DY, Lord E, Shamie AN. Retrospective evaluation of cervical fusion with DTRAX (R) cervical cage. J Craniovert Jun Spine [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 27 ];13:48-54
Available from: https://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2022;volume=13;issue=1;spage=48;epage=54;aulast=Yazdanshenas;type=0