Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 3: Line graphs showing the mean cervical Cobb's angle (a) and disc height (b). Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (a) The cervical Cobb angle was significantly improved compared to baseline (*P ≤ 0.05). (b) The mean disc height, at the treated level, was significantly restored after surgery in all the cases (*P ≤ 0.05 compared to baseline)

Figure 3: Line graphs showing the mean cervical Cobb's angle (a) and disc height (b). Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (a) The cervical Cobb angle was significantly improved compared to baseline (*<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05). (b) The mean disc height, at the treated level, was significantly restored after surgery in all the cases (*<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05 compared to baseline)